Listen to this pro-devil's manuscripts papist devil-priest

Expert knowledge versus uneducated opinion. [...] The debate about Bible versions is no different. There is a divide between scholarly people who can read Hebrew and Greek, who have studied theology and biblical archaeology and textual criticism all their lives, and a group of vocal individuals who do not have the scholarship background to be making the claims they do.

Hold your nose, and go here.

As if being able to discern the voice of the Shepherd vs. the croak of the devil is a matter of 'scholarship.' This devil-priest makes no mention of the Spirit of discernment, the Holy Spirit Himself. Why should he? The very fact that he champions the Westcott and Hort, Alexandrian devil's manuscripts (and the NIV, NASB, ESV, NRSV, NLT, TNIV, et al. [per]versions based on them) shows he's an unregenerate fool. Yet he self-identifies as Christian and has a desire to 'teach.' Ahh, isn't that sweet...

Look what else this sweet boy (scholar) wrote:

Then they say "there was a lesbian on the translation committee of the NIV". Who ‘authorized’ the Authorized Version? It was not God, but a homosexual paedophile king who sodomised little boys — King James I of England.

Yeah, good scholarship there. He read his anti-James I sources rigorously. See how we're back to the same forces facing each other as at the Reformation? Establishment Christianity vs. God's remnant. The former burning to defile and destroy the Word of God, the latter standing our ground to defend the Word of God -- to the death. Only because of the heroic efforts and sacrifices of our brothers and sisters back in the 1500s and 1600s these devils don't have the power of the state over us. Though they'll just band together with the atheists in time to accomplish that. A natural alliance.