This just in: Peter Enns not really the sharpest knife in the cutlery drawer

Folks, this is the intellectual level of professors at major Reformed seminaries:

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/peterenns/2011/11/taking-to-pastors-about-adam-and-evolution-options/

Not to mention all those pastors he was talking to.

And note that it's not just his subject matter, it's how shallow he is regarding the material itself.

A useful idiot in action.

Peter, why do you think there is evidence for macro evolution. Macro, mind you, not micro.

"'Cuz scientists say it, and stuff."

Do you realize the two worst witnesses for macro evolution (the theory that fish turn into race horses) are the fossil record and micro biology?

"'Cuz scientists say it, and stuff."

OK... Not to mention, origin of life itself aside, the chances of a single cell evolving mechanically are beyond impossible?

"'Cuz scientists say it, and stuff."

I suspect you have an Ivy League education, Peter. You know why? Because Ivy League graduates start sentences with "'Cuz" and end them with "and stuff." Anyway, most sentient scientists nowadays don't even believe in macro evolution anymore. Only the atheists among them like to keep it around in a bait and switch game with micro evolution because it's such good propaganda against Christianity and the Bible. At least it seems to have been. At least with shallow Christians. Nominal Christians. OK, dumb Christians.

"'Cuz, there's pictures in books, and stuff. Showing evolution, and stuff. 'Cuz..."

Enough. I get it. You're really stupid. Now what does that make all those pastors who came to be lectured to by you?