<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d14792577\x26blogName\x3dPLAIN+PATH+PURITAN\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://electofgod.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://electofgod.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d8382812700944261936', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

9.25.2005

Calvin on baptismal regeneration


Calvin:

How much evil has been caused by the dogma, ill expounded, that baptism is necessary to salvation, few perceive, and therefore think caution the less necessary. For when the opinion prevails that all are lost who happen not to be dipped in water, our condition becomes worse than that of God’s ancient people, as if his grace were more restrained than under the Law.

This passage very much does expound Calvin's position on baptismal regeneration, i.e. his obvious position against it. Some things Calvin thought too 'silly' to refute. I think he'd have done better to be more diligent and direct in denouncing the devilish doctrine of baptismal regeneration, yet his position is implicit in all that he wrote. He states clearly his biblical understanding that regeneration is effected by the Word and the Spirit. He just doesn't do it in one place, hence leaving an opening for mendacious clowns and devils to clip endlessly his words out-of-context to bolster their Beast-inspired attacks on apostolic biblical doctrine (Auburn Avenue clowns and devils, can you hear? Oh, no...you are too busy riding above the rabble, sending down your latest "this won't fool the Calvinists, but it might go a ways to fool the iMonk and his type"...)

Well, you've got some numbers there...

(iMonk, iMonk, iMonk... Praising that stupid, shabby, and so juvenile little essay by James B. Jordan to high heaven like you did...)

1 Comments:

Blogger c.t. said...

In another comment thread below the iMonk commented on this post with this:

On the Jordan essay: Sort of like being told you've invested all your stock in buggy whips, isn't it. ;-)

Wow. Sometimes the iMonk writes a post at his tavern and I actually entertain the thought that maybe he isn't as apostate from the truth as he usually seems (or maybe he's making his way back to the truth somewhat, or something), but then I read the above comment and all that goes out the window...

Anybody who can't see through that Jordan essay or who buy it to the least degree is a person who can't discern down from up.

When added to the nondiscernement the arrogance and petulance of demanding to teach and preach and 'correct' and critique and whine and bitch and accuse and shame and so on you have what is called a fully glass-eyed, tamed and conformed adherent of the devil and his kingdom, pure and simple...

September 25, 2005 at 9:14 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home