<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d14792577\x26blogName\x3dPLAIN+PATH+PURITAN\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://electofgod.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://electofgod.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d8382812700944261936', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe", messageHandlersFilter: gapi.iframes.CROSS_ORIGIN_IFRAMES_FILTER, messageHandlers: { 'blogger-ping': function() {} } }); } }); </script>

9.20.2005

Who are these weenies worthy knights, where did they come from?


centuriOn, ostensibly a male, wrote:

"ct is banned from my blog because he/she (we don't really know which) is a complete troll who cannot interact with anyone at any level without insults. That ct offends Armstrong is no surprise because ct offends everyone."

"In the end, you're
[he's speaking to Dave Armstrong] no better than ct because you cannot handle criticism without calling your adversary names."

This pudge-muffin has despised me with a womanly vengeance since I appeared in this mainstream Christian environment. Harumph. Well...so be it.

Anyway, since he called me a troll, and then he said Armstrong is no better than me, didn't he call Armstrong a troll?

And I speak to Armstrong the way I do because I'm a vicious, Foxe's Book of Martyrs-fueled, Holy Spirit-enabled defender of the Faith and on-the-mark doctrine anti-Papist. I don't mince words.

mince: To moderate or restrain (words) for the sake of politeness and decorum; euphemize: "Don't mince words: say what you mean." [or] To speak in an affected way.

Affected. That would be you, sitting there with that white doughnut powder spread across your chin, comic book in hand, getting ready to affect your voice again for another post on your blog, or respond somewhere in the Christian blogosphere. "Thus shall it ever be far from me to broadcast mine own brilliance [no, yes, brilliance] Thus shall it ever be far from me to broadcast mine own brilliance, yet I fear it must be done lest it never get done. I don't see a line of hardy souls waiting to broadcast my brilliance, as hard and long as I look out upon the horizon. For any worthy fools who hath read thus far allow me to set up the scene:

| >There once was a fat guy from somewhere
| >Who couldn't fathom conciliarist theories
|>His Calvin was lame
| >

Ah, poor audience...why finish? My opponent has embarassed himself enough to this point... What was I talking about? Does it matter? If you're reading you've already fathomed you have stumbled into a rather low-rent intellectual realm of time-suckness... Ballyhoo, anyway... ['suckness' is a bad word. Make this a draft and edit later....is 'low-rent' a racist word? do research]"

1 Comments:

Blogger c.t. said...

I'm just trying to make you men. Don't get all bent out of shape.

September 20, 2005 at 10:25 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home