<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d14792577\x26blogName\x3dPLAIN+PATH+PURITAN\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://electofgod.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://electofgod.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d8382812700944261936', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

1.17.2008

The most inane book review ever on a Christian internet site


Here it is:

Monergism Review: It is agreed that the nature of Jordan's theology is not always agreeable, being hard to comprehend from scripture. However, as a commentator he remains one of the best. His work on Daniel will inevitably become a standard. The content is challenging and never too complex so as to leave the reader in confusion. Even though one might not agree with all of Jordan's conclusions, his arguments will never be dismissed without a fight. This is a vast work that will provoke much thought and appreciation in its readers. In my opinion Jordan's refutation of the dispensational interpretation is enough to establish the work as necessary. No matter how wrong Jordan is, he is (almost) always more right than the dispensationalist. Jordan adds to the wealth of literature on Daniel, but not in a disappointing fashion. One must always read discerningly and it is no different with Jordan. In the end the content disagreed with in the commentary will not be as much as the content agreed with in the commentary. With all theological disagreement aside, this is a must own commentary on Daniel!
--B. K. Campbell


The guy who runs monergismbooks.com (and monergism.com) has been in love with Federal Visionists for a long time, though he is reluctant for obvious reasons to admit it in public. He's been selling anything Doug Wilson writes or plagiarizes from the beginning, and he allowed a Federal Visionist to redo his website including the Covenant Theology page. When some longtime readers complained about all the missing links to classic sources on CT and all the new links to poisonous Federal Vision sources the site owner relented and put back some of the missing links, but only God knows what is still missing. He also adds little disclaimers on the product pages for Doug Wilson books warning his customers about Wilson's heterodox doctrine, but they are half-hearted and don't appear on all of Wilson's pages on his site. He is also mocking and angry when he is called on these things. Now he is selling a book by James Jordan (with the accompanying review above).

Monergism.com and monergismbooks.com, yet another part of the apostasy of the end times.

1 Comments:

Blogger c.t. said...

Why do I care? Good question. These are just shallow, currently unregenerate (putting it charitably) Christians doing what shallow, currently unregenerate Christians do. God's elect are rare. Regeneration by the Word and the Spirit is rare. It all takes place in the fullness of time, as only God perceives the fullness of time, but at any given era in the history of redemption, as human beings perceive time, the presence of God's elect is rare. The numbers are few.

January 17, 2008 at 3:25 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home