<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d14792577\x26blogName\x3dPLAIN+PATH+PURITAN\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttp://electofgod.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://electofgod.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d3757314713231228019', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>


James White yet again...

It's confirmed now, James White is actually blocking critics from commenting on his YouTube videos. James 'the Debater' White. James the fearful Jesuit who lives under his desk White.

This is what the Bible tells us: confront the devil, and he will run from you.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

So? Why don't you call in to the DL? You know he's not afraid. He just doesn't want to be bothered spending all his time policing his vlog comboxes. Why are you and Ehrman so scared s***less over a few typos? At least acknowledge they exist - not to do so is crazy.

March 15, 2008 at 12:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If he does take down Ehrman, won't you at least acknowledge he's doing good work? People like you and Riplinger and Ruckman would just sit around twiddling your thumbs and let roaring lions like Ehrman walketh about and devour people unopposed.

March 15, 2008 at 12:52 PM  
Blogger c.t. said...

White needs an environment like his internet show because he can't get away with his sophistry and fallacious rhetoric when he is on neutral ground or in the company of men of God who won't allow him to get away with that (such as on the PuritanBoard where he is a member and is very studied in avoiding the subject of the traditional text vs. the corrupt Alexandrian manuscripts).

And look what happened on the YouTube thread(s): I get blocked from commenting and immediately a couple of White's followers come on and post such scholarly observations as that the apostle Paul didn't speak and write in English or asserting that the Authorized Version is somehow radically different from 1611 to 1769 or whatever. The morons are on the critical text side, and always have been. It is 'Darwinian Evolution' level dumb.

March 15, 2008 at 3:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Leave James alone. Why don't you attack Dan Wallace more often? He's JW squared with regards to textual crriticism. And he exhibits the
> flaws
you seem most afraid of.

March 17, 2008 at 8:10 AM  
Blogger c.t. said...

White and Wallace are the same. White could have written this at-the-same-time inane and satanically malignant post himself:


The subject is regeneration. As long as you refuse to humble yourself to that which is above you you will remain in darkness. Regeneration is the main thing. White doesn't have it as much as Wallace doesn't have it. They are vain, juvenile intellectuals . They are liberal theologians. When you are liberal on the Word of God you are a liberal theologian no matter how well you have have learned your tulip manuals (in White's case).

The road Wallace is inevitably treading is caused by his view of Scripture. That White seems further away from that road and destination currently means nothing. He setting others on that road, and as an individual he remains unregenerate and his evangelizing is sterile.

March 17, 2008 at 1:19 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home