Critical Text master scholar responds (self-awareness rating...oh never mind)
Here's some feedback on a recent interview I conducted awhile back with a Critical Text master scholar:
To be clever, satire must be based on truth. What you posted here - while I'm honored that you don't have time to debate this in a cross-exam format, but you do have time to post insults about me - is Inquisitional type thinking.
So you're UK67 and c.t. - and nobody knows your name. And you think such deception is representing God greatly, do you?
Once again - the challenge has been laid down. It is time to put up or shut up. Do you wish to debate the issue of KJV Onlyism or not? You have already indicated you cannot - while spreading lies about me for the whole world to see.
The Judge who gave His Son does not wink at the cleverness of your own depravity. - Maestroh
My response:
>To be clever, satire must be based on truth. What you posted here - while I'm honored that you don't have time to debate this in a cross-exam format, but you do have time to post insults about me - is Inquisitional type thinking.
I suppose it's best that we allow neutral observers to determine how much truth is in my 'interview' with you and in your 'interviews' with other people.
Meanwhile, as to a debate: once again, you tried that on the PuritanBoard with Winzer and Rafalsky, and the results are still there for all to see (your footprints making a hasty retreat). I myself would just continue to make fun of you because your whole thing is to say that what came out of Madame Blavatsky's nether region is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness...
4 Comments:
Of course, this is throwing apples into the orange bin. Unlike you, I linked actual statements - you did not do so for me because there is only maybe two things I said, and you provide no context.
Now as far as your continual lie about Puritan Board - again, you find it convenient to hide behind someone else. Come out from behind your lies and act like a man, my friend.
Of course, that's obviously too tall an order. But I appreciate your obssession with me. It gets my blog more hits.
Winzer and Rafalsky got down into the trenches with you, as they like to do. For myself, it's enough for me to just point out that you are eating things that came out of Madame Blavatsky's nether region.
Humble yourself to the pure and whole received traditional text Word of God. That is serious. You're not there now. It is about regeneration. You're in no better a situation than a Romanist with their dead ritual right now. In your case you are accepting only man-authority and rebelling - disdaining - the authority of God. You can't see this in yourself currently, but this Christian can tell you, and some day it may sink in...
You see it - the differences in manuscripts and the versions based on them - as small differences (changes in wording here, a missing verse there, etc.) and first of all that is not small when you begin to admit that those small differences seen as a whole rather than in mere parts expose types and patterns of Satanic corruption through and through, but that aside, right now you see the difference in the Alexandrian manuscripts and the traditional text as small, but what you are missing that is very big is the difference between fearing and revering man and man's authority vs. fearing and revering God alone and God's authority alone. The former is very easy because it keeps your vanity, worldly pride, and rebellious self-will alive and in control. The latter is difficult because it mortifies your vanity, worldly pride, and rebellious self-will. And this is the difference in regeneration vs. being still dead asleep, in bondage to the darkness and the illusions and delusions of the Devil's kingdom.
When scholars and academia are your authority your 'Old Man' nature remains unassaulted and very comfortable.
The 'Old Man' inside you doesn't like the received traditional text, and mocks it and mocks believers who are able to see and accept it and its authority which comes from God. Make an effort to like what 'it' - your Old Man nature - doesn't like.
You know, I can't help but wonder: if this Maestroh guy is as dumb you assert, why don't you just wipe the floor with him on the Net?
I checked out Puritan Board, and the fact is that Maestroh is the one telling the truth. There was a 'discussion' but hardly a 'debate.' Nor was I impressed with either Maestroh himself (I wonder if he knows the word doesn't have an 'h' in the original?) or with the other two KJV Only nuts, both of whom simply kept reasserting their position.
But if you're actually as educated as you continue to claim you are, why don't you meet the guy online and expose him?
It seems to me that you're little more than a hypocrite if you say somebody won't debate somebody else but you're not willing to engage the issue yourself.
Post a Comment
<< Home