<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d14792577\x26blogName\x3dPLAIN+PATH+PURITAN\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://electofgod.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://electofgod.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d8382812700944261936', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

5.17.2008

Another 'Puritan'Board thread reveals the witch in churchianity


They keep doing it. Here is another thread where the man-fearing (and really eminent pussies) of the so-called PuritanBoard are revealing themselves.

A new guy (reminds me of myself when I attempted to post things over there way back when other than "What is YOUR favorite kind of tea?") introduces a topic a bit over the head of the active old-timers and the toadies and all he gets is threats and feet-stamping and calls to 'adhere' to forum 'authority'... Churchians are pussies to their core.

Real Puritans (like, say, Drake) would beat these fools to death if they'd even attempted to talk in the manner they talk over their to him. Where are the men in the 'churches' today? They don't exist. Just witches. Serving the Great Witch which is the Beast.

6 Comments:

Blogger c.t. said...

OK, Drake might not actually beat them to death, but he'd probably throw them in some body of water, letting them know they are a bit wet...

On a bad day he might actually beat them to death though. You have to be careful when you are a Churchian talking to a man of God.

May 17, 2008 at 11:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The devil would win if he beat them to death!

He'd just throw them in the drink.

May 18, 2008 at 6:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Notice the new topic over there about there not being a "distinctive" Byzantine reading in Paul before the ninth century?

Of course, only someone who is a complete ignoramus in textual critcism would make that assertion.

But then, those who make such assertions are not only unregenerate, they are also totally inept when it comes to even the basics of textual criticism, and though they like to pride themselves on their Greek knowledge, they can't even PROUNOUCE Greek properly, let alone speak it, which is why native Greeks who are fluent in English have nothing but utter contempt for modern Anglo-Greek scholarship.

And of course, there is a very simple reason that native Greeks who are fluent in English adhere with virtual unanimity to the King James Bible in English -- native Greeks who are fluent in English in America, Canada, Britain, the isles, Australia, etcetera.

And there is a reason why my native Greek friends who are fluent in English literally belly-laugh at the assertions of modern Anglo-Greek "experts" who can't even pronounce Greek properly, let alone speak it.

For two quick examples of the absurdity of Greek "experts" who can't even pronounce Greek properly, let alone speak it, see --

http://www.lamblion.net/Articles/ScottJones/monogenes.htm

and --

http://www.lamblion.net/Articles/ScottJones/indictment_of_ignorance.htm

Scott
www.lamblion.net

May 19, 2008 at 5:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, I might add -- for just a SMALL SAMPLING of what is available to various readings (regardless of the shell-game of manuscript classification), see --

http://www.lamblion.net/Articles/patristic_chart.htm

Scott
www.lamblion.net

May 19, 2008 at 6:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just snap when I see the moderators over there speaking to other members as if they are children. And then appealing to the authority of people who have been through seminaries. (Didn't Shelby Spong go through a seminary?)

It's all not only very Roman Catholic but Roman Catholic circa mid 1500s.

Then of course as you bring up these are the same types that want to dictate to all Protestants that the Alexandrian manuscripts and versions based on them are the actual Word of God.

All very Jesuit-ish. 16th century Jesuitish...

May 19, 2008 at 9:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The moderators over at the Puritan Board are ignorant, as well as being clearly unregenerate. You shouldn't lose any sleep over them.

Scott
www.lamblion.net

May 20, 2008 at 11:13 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home