<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d14792577\x26blogName\x3dPLAIN+PATH+PURITAN\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://electofgod.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://electofgod.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d8382812700944261936', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

11.05.2008

A very creepy strain in Reformed churchianity


Look at this post-election post from a Reformed Christian:

It is important to see the silver lining in clouds.

a) Mrs. Clinton will have to wait 8 years before running for president;
b) Mrs. Palin will be able to spend more time with her children; and
c) America was spared from having a woman Vice President (although America has an even-more-firmly-entrenched female Speaker of the House).


This actually sounds sodomitish. Muslims are notorious secret sodomites and have similar effeminate and unchivalrous attitudes towards women.

These types of churchians will vote for a thousand liberal effeminate men before they'd vote for one conservative Christian woman.

The faith found in the Word of God is eschatological. When you have the Spirit in you, when you have been regenerated by the Word and the Spirit, 'male' and 'female' are seen to be what they are: flesh categories and roles among the unregenerate.

Regenerated Christians are neither 'male' nor 'female' which is why regenerated Christians so freak out not only churchianity Christians but the world (including the sodomites).

4 Comments:

Blogger Turretinfan said...

Dear CT,

Sodomy is contrary to the law of God and the light of nature. I continue to hold that a just punishment for sodomy is death.

There is an important distinction between men and women, which partially explains the abhorrence of sodomy. Likewise, men and woman have different roles not only in bed but in the world.

Thus, I hold to the position that the Biblical mandate is for patriarchy. I am not an egalitarian.

I think that Isaiah 3:12 supports my position that it is God's judgment when a nation is ruled by women. For the moment, that particular judgment has not come in its fullest extent on America. If you disagree, so be it. I did not come here to debate you or insult you, just to explain my position to you.

-TurretinFan

November 5, 2008 at 10:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Isa 3:12 As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

Isa. 3:12 is a good verse for you if you are willing to not acknowledge any difference between individual human beings. Some of your male leaders are the most wicked and effiminate creeps that have ever ascended to power. One Sarah Palin is worth more than the entire House and Senate of both Democrats AND Republicans today.

Notice you say nothing of the faith being eschatological. You don't understand the Spirit and regeneration. This is why you are a Jew wannabee theonomist.

With the Spirit, and the discernment and understanding and power that comes with the Spirit the apostle Paul is made an equal with any woman, and perhaps, in some cases, effectively an inferior.

With the Spirit there is no male and female. Without the Spirit there is ONLY effeminate worshipers and 'servicers' of the devil.

November 5, 2008 at 1:23 PM  
Blogger Turretinfan said...

Dear CT,

I did not come here to debate you. We have our disagreements, to be sure, and they are not all small disagreements.

I would agree, however, that Mrs. Palin is worth more than a good many men in Congress and the Senate. I wonder what you think of Ron Paul, though? He's a remarkable man, seemingly a man of principle.

-TurretinFan

November 5, 2008 at 1:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you read a list of Ron Paul's positions you can agree with him 98% or so. But the 2% tend to be big. The overriding thing about Ron Paul though is: he's not a leader. He's a position-taker who can afford to chirp from a back bench because he doesn't have any responsibility to hold anything together or move anything. I don't suspect his positions are very deeply held either (other than his economic positions, perhaps). I suspect he also is like the average Libertarian (whether he is one or not) in that his discernment for such Spiritually-discerned things as good and evil is a bit shallow.

November 5, 2008 at 1:59 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home