Response to hell boy

To Peter Enns, who got upset enough by my previous post to write a long post about how Christians shouldn't be mean to Peter Enns, I would simply reply that we mean Christians save our meanness for false teachers, and really not only false teachers but false teachers who present themselves to be something they are not, such as Reformed (as in taking employment in Reformed seminaries). No, Peter, if you were just hanging around John Shelby Spong at a local Dennys, lapping up his every word of wisdom, and taking notes to Boswell out a big memoir of the great man, then I would likely be indifferent to you. But the truly, actively, consciously wicked false teachers tend to go where the truth resides and attempt to defile it within the temple, so to speak. This is what you've done. This is what you continue to do. You have the stench of hell fire on you. I will sound an alarm and call you what you are: a creep who loves darkness so much that he wants to do nothing more than to defile the truth his every waking day. And why do you, like all false teachers, love darkness so, Peter? Well, we can't know, can we? We don't have access to all the security cameras. But you false teachers always have *something* that you love and want to continue doing and so desire to keep in the dark. Hence your viciousness towards the light. It's a losing battle, Peter. You can annoy God's plan, but you can't defeat God's plan. Yet you think you can. Why? Sin is irrational to its core.