Nominal Christians can't hide their hatred of the actual word of God
Wow, in recent days the mockers of the word of God at the PuritanBoard have come out of their closets (or climbed up out of their dark holes). The mocking of the KJV, the hatred directed at it, is nothing less than the mocking and hatred of the word of God and of God Himself. Nominal Christians give themselves away (think: Roman Catholics) when it gets down to the actual word of God.
I'm not going to rehearse the disgusting activity over there, but one note: one of the main God-haters over there named 'Tim V.' has posted that the late Theodore Letis didn't believe the Bible was inerrant. No, Letis disliked the term inerrant and preferred the term infallible. Though 'Tim V.' wants his hearers to think Letis didn't believe the Bible was even infallible. This is what goes on in common Reformed environments *when they ban all regenerate voices from their midst.* They are disgusting souls. Rancid souls. Dead souls.
Again, just like Roman Catholics, when it comes down to the actual word of God the Satanic spirit of nominal Christians becomes manifest without shame.
3 Comments:
What are you going on about? Point to the thread from PB.
Besides, you behave like no Majority Texter in history. What KJV devotee obsesses over occult self-absorption? I've heard of Catholics like that -- lots of them -- but never protestants.
You go trawl through that sewage yourself.
I will point you to the Letis reference:
http://www.puritanboard.com/f63/only-perfect-translation-70942/index2.html#post910928
Historically Puritans - of the English or Dutch tradition - were accused of being self-absorbed, in so many words ('self-absorbed' is a more modern term). In truth we're trying to awake out of sleep (the ultimate self-absorption). And when the apostle Paul tells you to awaken out of sleep (Rom. 13:11) he is not talking about head-on-pillow sleep, pilgrim.
>Besides, you behave like no Majority Texter in history.
I recognize and value the Received Text, Hebrew and Greek, as the God-preserved manuscripts. And before I get the usual ill-informed response, yes any manuscript stream needs to be edited, but there is a difference between editing a unified stream received manuscript and *constructing* a text from a multitude of divergent manuscript streams or just individual manuscripts.
That said, anything you say regarding 'occult' I can counter with the very word of God itself, and you will have no defense because you havn't studied the Bible, specifically the teaching of Jesus Himself, regarding spiritual warfare and progressive sanctification because the leaders who you follow like Romanists follow the commands of their priests don't want you anywhere near those subjects.
Post a Comment
<< Home