<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d14792577\x26blogName\x3dPLAIN+PATH+PURITAN\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://electofgod.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://electofgod.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d8382812700944261936', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

11.29.2011

Was Carl Trueman 'initiated' by the same Roman Catholic priest as James White?

I was suspicious when this liberal 'Reformed' internet podcast dedicated its most recent show to the King James Bible:

http://reformedforum.org/ctc204/

I mean, I wasn't really overtly suspicious, but more surprised with a hint of perplexed wariness.

So not 30 minutes into the show, an interview with a 'scholar', Carl Trueman, Trueman very deftly states as fact that King James was a homosexual, and (wait for it), compares King James to Adolf Hitler. (He states King James and Adolf Hitler had similar leadership styles.) He makes both statements as if it's the most natural thing in the world to do. The interviewer swallows both statements as if Trueman had stated James was a good writer and knowledgeable of biblical doctrine.

Anyway, Trueman is a Ph.D., and who in the seminary realm ever questions a Ph.D.? If one of those guys says the Bible gives warrant to blood-drinking the little dogs like Camden Bucey of seminary world (the interviewer in this case) will accept it and mock any 'lay' people who would comically disagree (in their cute 'layperson' ignorance).

I've written Bucey asking him if any of their famous false teacher professors that have taught for decades over there at Westminster Theological Seminary loved (I originally had the 'f' word) all of them in the ass. He deleted the comment the question appeared in. (I've removed the name of the professor I originally had referenced because I have no evidence he was doing that to students over there. I'm not going to do what Carl Trueman - and Roman Catholics throughout history - did to King James.)

Folks, if you think the Romanist Counter-Reformation ever ended you don't know Satan and his wicked little children.

2 Comments:

Blogger c.t. said...

I feel kind of dirty even writing the names of these people anymore. Yet because they are attacking at the foundation of the faith they deserve to be roundly exposed put in their place. Don't expect anybody in Reformed academia to do it though. They play by the Satanic rules of the world, and happily so. In fact they demand to.

For instance just look at the latest writings of Peter Enns on his website like this: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/peterenns/2011/11/two-final-recurring-mistakes-in-the-adamevolution-discussion-4/

You won't see any Reformed academic write anything exposing the sheer stupidity of their fellow academic (in a way that doesn't obviate the entire exercise by granting Enns status as a 'pastor/professor/cleric/whatever 'in good standing', etc.). These people are worldly academics first, cowards seconds, and lukewarm Christians third (if third...actually if Christian at all).

November 29, 2011 at 3:55 AM  
Blogger c.t. said...

This is my last post about Reformed academics and their Romanist tendencies. People don't change. I should say, people who have already self-identified as Christian and adopt the devil's playbook don't change.

November 29, 2011 at 5:03 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home